Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 17 '18 at 19:46
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 79.5
1-Core 53.7
2-Core 106
51% 79.7 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 296
30% 245 Pts
64-Core 324
20% 324 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.12.2
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.6% Below average
Lighting 32.6
Reflection 56.8
Parallax 67
27% 52.2 fps
MRender 57.6
Gravity 50
Splatting 46
41% 51.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
66% Good
Read 483
Write 321
Mixed 203
74% 336 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 19
74% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 86.1
DQ Mixed 46.7
50% 83.5 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 66%
Great: 97%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
311GB free
Firmware: CC34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 55.1
Write 18.8
Mixed 14.9
22% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 0.65
4K Mixed 0.35
76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 61%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
24GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
48% Average
Read 87.1
Write 79.9
Mixed 14.7
44% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.12
79% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 14.8
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 9.6
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $679
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback