User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming 15%
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 108%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics4.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Systembluechip bluechip BUSINESSline individu
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME X399-A
Memory61 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '18 at 09:39
Run Duration86 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$639
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
116% Outstanding
SC Int 120
SC Float 126
SC Mixed 120
97% 122 Pts
QC Int 431
QC Float 454
QC Mixed 469
102% 452 Pts
MC Int 2392
MC Float 2,482
MC Mixed 2,446
366% 2440 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 116%
Great: 118%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
PNY(196E 118B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
4.49% Terrible
Lighting 13.4
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 13.7
4% 12.8 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 14.1
5% 11.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.49%
Great: 5%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$98
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 517
Write 412
Mixed 419
100% 450 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 19.2
119% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 30.5
DQ Write 65.7
DQ Mixed 17.1
22% 37.8 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905701-008.A00G 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
143% Outstanding
MC Read 56.6
MC Write 59.2
MC Mixed 54.6
162% 56.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 23.1
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 143%
Great: 85%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $157SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback