Gigabyte GA-X99P-SLI-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Gunboat	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	59.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99P-SLI-CF (all builds)
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160722
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 17 '18 at 07:36
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$78 50,196 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Memory 91.4 1-Core 117 2-Core 231 83% 146 Pts	4-Core 458 8-Core 728 73% 593 Pts	64-Core 902 56% 902 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 8C94) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Lighting 74.5 Reflection 78.7 Parallax 67.2 61% 73.4 fps	MRender 68.7 Gravity 69 Splatting 73 58% 70.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 277GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	162% Outstanding	Read 1,391 Write 952 Mixed 1,018 248% 1,120 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 67.3 4K Mixed 30 125% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 316 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 98.2 112% 195 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 162% Great: 254%
Sandisk SD8SBBU240G1122 240GB 2,683 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 34GB free Firmware: Z3106000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 5430 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2498 (A5) Unknown 100 100 6683077576291 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 20 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 7 (AE) Unknown 100 100 36 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 47 30 300647710773 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 2340763861537 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1721 (EA) Unknown 100 100 15324 (F1) Unknown 253 253 8459 (F2) Unknown 253 253 5442 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	67.5% Good	Read 505 Write 411 Mixed 198 82% 371 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 49.6 4K Mixed 0.17 50% 21.7 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 204 DQ Mixed 0.06 56% 137 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 66%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 67 (03) Spinup time 128 128 21494300967 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 9947 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 7509 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2497 (C0) Power-off retract count 92 92 9953 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 9953 (C2) HDA temperature 153 153 193274511399 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	95% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 159 Mixed 158 123% 163 MB/s	4K Read 0.91 4K Write 2.03 4K Mixed 0.22 100% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 95% Great: 108%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB 143 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free, PID 0400 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Read 188 Write 163 Mixed 29.5 145% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.94 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.18 66% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 9905678-026.A00G 9905678-026.A00G 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	100% Outstanding	MC Read 36.5 MC Write 45.1 MC Mixed 34.9 111% 38.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 19 SC Mixed 19.1 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 65.1 61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 100% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 100%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99P-SLI-CF Builds (Compare 313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 70%

Battleship

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 63%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99P-SLI-CF

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $78Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	110x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	60x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	37x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	35x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	22x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	16x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	12x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	11x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 4x8GBUnknownBench 87%, 1,963 samples	14x
HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 90%, 782 samples	10x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 82%, 1,079 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 128% - Outstanding

Total price: $305

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16