Dell OptiPlex 7010

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Dell OptiPlex 7010
Motherboard	Dell OptiPlex 7010 (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130909
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	May 17 '18 at 06:32
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	79.9% Very good	Memory 91 1-Core 106 2-Core 210 78% 135 Pts	4-Core 376 8-Core 516 56% 446 Pts	64-Core 515 32% 515 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.64 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.7% Below average	Lighting 40.1 Reflection 30.5 Parallax 37 33% 35.9 fps	MRender 37.2 Gravity 37.6 Splatting 35.3 30% 36.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: 000F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 35573 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1281 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 17127 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 95 95 177 (AE) Unknown 100 100 207 (B5) Unknown 100 100 -116195151879918 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 14986188 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 82 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 31 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 95 95 5 (CE) Flying height 100 99 17127	40.1% Average	Read 478 Write 192 Mixed 275 69% 315 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 7.49 4K Mixed 3.86 33% 9.02 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 72%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB 13,194 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 839GB free Firmware: 4C01 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Read 153 Write 140 Mixed 84.1 93% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.82 4K Write 7.23 4K Mixed 0.63 238% 2.89 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 103%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 417GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 142 140 3858 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1073 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 10445 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1063 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 76 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 191 191 27023 (C2) HDA temperature 111 96 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 87 87 9848 (F1) Unknown 200 200 52922910416 (F2) Unknown 200 200 66477777864	66.8% Good	Read 115 Write 118 Mixed 116 88% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.93 4K Mixed 0.49 118% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 69%
I-O DATA HDCZ-UT 3TB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1.5TB free, PID 016c Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 130 Write 126 Mixed 91.9 145% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.95 4K Write 2.46 4K Mixed 0.29 97% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 72%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB 1,739 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 59GB free, PID 0749 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Read 87.9 Write 57.2 Mixed 72.5 89% 72.5 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0.99 4K Mixed 0.77 74% 1.92 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F8G64CB8HC9N-DI 1x8GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	30% Below average	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 8.5 26% 9.17 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 9.8 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 65.8 61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OptiPlex 7010 Builds (Compare 11,571 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7010

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	3,912x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	3,532x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	1,606x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	2,186x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	983x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	933x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	466x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	184x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	176x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	226x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	158x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 56%, 6,584 samples	152x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16