Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 146%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 153%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics161% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive262% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170906
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 17 '18 at 05:34
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i9-7900X-$904
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
110% Outstanding
SC Int 124
SC Float 128
SC Mixed 125
101% 126 Pts
QC Int 491
QC Float 509
QC Mixed 500
113% 500 Pts
MC Int 1,529
MC Float 1,746
MC Mixed 1,660
246% 1,645 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 110%
Great: 126%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$713
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Lighting 528
Reflection 499
Parallax 545
165% 524 fps
MRender 255
Gravity 522
Splatting 291
158% 356 fps
Poor: 61%
This bench: 161%
Great: 177%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$360
766GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 2,063
Write 1,816
Mixed 1,679
413% 1,853 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 30.6
193% 80.3 MB/s
DQ Read 42.9
DQ Write 519
DQ Mixed 30.7
98% 198 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 262%
Great: 357%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$242
234GB free
Firmware: DXM04B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 519
Write 464
Mixed 493
110% 492 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 80.8
4K Mixed 20.2
115% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 31.2
DQ Write 87.9
DQ Mixed 20.5
27% 46.5 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 117%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$207
198GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 500
Write 236
Mixed 353
80% 363 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 18.6
113% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 38.4
DQ Write 64.5
DQ Mixed 33.4
30% 45.5 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 116%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$98
127GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 414
Mixed 418
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 41.3
156% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 39.9
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 128
107% 148 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 101%
Great: 134%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB
993GB free
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 160
Mixed 154
120% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.25
82% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 150%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB
206GB free
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 96
Write 97.3
Mixed 92.8
72% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.2
77% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 150%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3466 C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 67.8
MC Mixed 38.1
138% 48.2 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 10.7
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 119%
Great: 132%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 910 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $1,331
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $157SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback