Asrock FM2A85X Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A85X Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121219
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 15 '18 at 18:03
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 71.6
2-Core 138
60% 97.9 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 201
28% 206 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 60%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D
ASRock(1849 9901) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.101.0.0
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
3.85% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 6.42
Parallax 6.94
4% 5.99 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 6.27
Splatting 5.35
4% 4.86 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.85%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso 128GB 128GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0213E Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 318
Write 160
Mixed 103
42% 194 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 2.33
36% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 18.8
DQ Write 19.4
DQ Mixed 3.55
7% 13.9 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HCS5C1010CLA382 1TB
699GB free
Firmware: JC4OA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 92.9
Write 113
Mixed 27.2
56% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.37
86% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59%
Great: 64%
Corsair Flash Voyager GT USB 3.0 32GB-$20
5GB free, PID 1a09
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 34
Write 29.5
Mixed 27.3
38% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 9.43
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.23
46% 3.25 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 51%
Generic USB 2.0 1GB
0GB free, PID 7777
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.1% Poor
Read 19.8
Write 21.7
Mixed 20.8
27% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.03
4K Write 5.14
4K Mixed 2.2
261% 3.46 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.5% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8.8
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A85X Extreme6 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A85X Extreme6 - $239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $488
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback