| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130524 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | May 15 '18 at 17:37 |
| Run Duration | 198 Seconds |
| Run User | SWE-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
81%
Excellent
|
79% 133 Pts
|
53% 421 Pts
|
33% 532 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Nvidia(10DE 1051) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50.7%
Above average
|
51% 67.9 fps
|
50% 63 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Dominator DDR3 2400 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
68.7%
Good
|
67% 23.5 GB/s
|
58% 20.2 GB/s
|
81% 49.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 710 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 396x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 105x |
| Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 63x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 58x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 56x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 44x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 99% - Outstanding | Total price: $722 |