MSI MS-16J5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemMicro-Star GL62 6QF
MotherboardMSI MS-16J5  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '18 at 23:16
Run Duration486 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
29.9% Poor
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 79.2
43% 80.7 Pts
4-Core 77.2
8-Core 79
11% 78.1 Pts
64-Core 74.7
5% 74.7 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
MSI(1462 115A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4300
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
5.31% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 46.1
Parallax 22.3
0% 22.9 fps
MRender 20.5
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 33.2
6% 24.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.31%
Great: 6%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Transcend MTS800 M.2 128GB-$94
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0918B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 494
Write 146
Mixed 221
62% 287 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 17.9
86% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 35.5
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 34.9
38% 60.8 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 87%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
519GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 111
Write 133
Mixed 118
91% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.22
86% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 77%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075 750GB
328GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
8.21% Terrible
Read 40.8
Write 5.2
Mixed 9.18
17% 18.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 0.34
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.21%
Great: 19%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
9.9% Terrible
Read 23.4
Write 6.78
Mixed 10.3
14% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 1.24
4K Mixed 0.92
92% 2.42 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.9%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
45.8% Average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 21.3
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 16.2
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 76%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MS-16J5 Builds (Compare 5,966 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $224
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback