HP 550-103na

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP 550-103na (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 2B52
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160301
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 14 '18 at 16:05
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	91%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-8750 Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G 1,794 User benchmarks, average bench 43% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Memory 61.8 1-Core 69.6 2-Core 133 51% 88 Pts	4-Core 203 8-Core 205 27% 204 Pts	64-Core 205 13% 205 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Zotac(19DA 1438) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.64 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Lighting 74.1 Reflection 73.9 Parallax 63.2 60% 70.4 fps	MRender 68.5 Gravity 65.4 Splatting 66.1 54% 66.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 182GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 12307 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 199 (B1) Unknown 95 95 96 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 57 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 54 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8677185964	82.8% Excellent	Read 472 Write 366 Mixed 396 92% 411 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 65.5 4K Mixed 37.5 110% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 66.2 70% 118 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 124%
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB 5,673 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02H0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 3616 (0B) Calibration retry count 99 99 124 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 7333 (AA) Unknown 100 100 381 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 95 95 99 (AE) Unknown 99 99 124 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 6051 (BE) vendor-specific 63 59 37 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1	59.5% Above average	Read 462 Write 115 Mixed 178 54% 252 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 72.6 4K Mixed 22.8 92% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 71.1 69% 111 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 172 166 4375 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9141 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3538 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7319 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 98 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 179 179 63996 (C2) HDA temperature 117 109 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	73% Very good	Read 119 Write 135 Mixed 127 96% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 2.03 4K Mixed 0.19 95% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB 4,966 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.7% Below average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 13.9 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 8.5 20% 7.07 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 550-103na Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP 550-103na

CPU
A10-8750 Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8GAMDBench 43%, 1,794 samples	18x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	14x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 73%, 5,673 samples	10x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 4,222 samples	6x
HMT451U6DFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 49%, 260 samples	4x
8KTF51264AZ-1G9P1 2x4GBMicronBench 46%, 297 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16