HP 550-103na

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics58.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP 550-103na  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B52
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160301
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 14 '18 at 11:57
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 79%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-8750 Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 63.1
1-Core 55.5
2-Core 128
48% 82.1 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 204
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.9% Above average
Lighting 74.2
Reflection 74.9
Parallax 64.1
60% 71.1 fps
MRender 68.3
Gravity 65.8
Splatting 69.7
56% 67.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
182GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 471
Write 365
Mixed 396
91% 410 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 63.6
4K Mixed 37.5
110% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 64.7
68% 114 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 124%
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 458
Write 108
Mixed 180
54% 249 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 26.1
98% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 99.4
DQ Mixed 54.3
60% 103 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 119
Write 135
Mixed 127
96% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 2.12
4K Mixed 0.21
96% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.7% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 13
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.9
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550-103na Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 550-103na

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback