MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	60.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B79
Motherboard	MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180403
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 12 '18 at 15:51
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.1% Outstanding	Memory 89.2 1-Core 127 2-Core 254 87% 157 Pts	4-Core 509 8-Core 968 88% 739 Pts	64-Core 1,384 86% 1,384 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3724) CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2258 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 397.64 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Lighting 73.7 Reflection 72.2 Parallax 64.6 60% 70.2 fps	MRender 78.2 Gravity 70.5 Splatting 73.8 61% 74.2 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199 19,348 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -44985486546438 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1261 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 325 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 109 109 26557703 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 325 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 658105 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 55 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 658105 (F2) Unknown 100 100 836314 (F9) Unknown 100 100 19711	67.4% Good	Read 499 Write 141 Mixed 207 61% 282 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 77.5 4K Mixed 18.4 114% 42.7 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 14.4 42% 91.1 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 88%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 134 134 34387853740 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 803 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 10008 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 712 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1062 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1062 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 197569347619 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	87.6% Excellent	Read 150 Write 156 Mixed 162 118% 156 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.29 4K Mixed 0.17 63% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 107%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 466GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 199 0 (03) Spinup time 170 166 6458 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4626 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 56 56 32279 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3384 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 208 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 47 47 459772 (C2) HDA temperature 119 108 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 1 30325 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	46.6% Average	Read 75.5 Write 86.8 Mixed 74.3 59% 78.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.15 62% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 67%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 169GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 171 168 2433 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1776 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 17296 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1080 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 94 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1688 (C2) HDA temperature 110 100 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	76.9% Very good	Read 144 Write 124 Mixed 137 102% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 2.23 4K Mixed 0.25 104% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55 215,644 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 43.2 MC Write 38 MC Mixed 33.6 109% 38.3 GB/s	SC Read 28.5 SC Write 37.9 SC Mixed 28.9 91% 31.8 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 1,480 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) - $112

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	430x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	208x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	185x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	99x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	76x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	73x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	66x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	60x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	56x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	83x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	75x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	64x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $608

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) - $112

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)