Notebook P17SM-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive57.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemNotebook P17SM-A  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P17SM-A
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140912
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 10 '18 at 15:05
Run Duration98 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 26.1
2-Core 73.5
40% 58.9 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 321
30% 247 Pts
64-Core 563
35% 563 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 75%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 477
Write 339
Mixed 334
85% 383 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 20.5
4K Mixed 10.1
54% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 79.5
DQ Write 26.2
DQ Mixed 10.2
19% 38.7 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 108%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
615GB free
Firmware: AX001U Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 81.1
Write 87.7
Mixed 79.8
62% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.18
67% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
29.4% Poor
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 8.7
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P17SM-A Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook P17SM-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $145
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback