Asrock FM2A75 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121123
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMay 09 '18 at 23:52
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 80
1-Core 61.6
2-Core 116
54% 85.8 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 202
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Asus(1043 3011) 2GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.4.4
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Lighting 25.7
Reflection 29.3
Parallax 32.2
21% 29.1 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 23
Splatting 34.7
24% 28.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 480GB-$250
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 303
Write 182
Mixed 211
51% 232 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 15.2
4K Mixed 7.91
43% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 21.2
DQ Write 18.8
DQ Mixed 9.41
10% 16.5 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 65%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
519GB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 112
Write 158
Mixed 126
99% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 5.46
4K Mixed 0.74
213% 2.31 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 110%
Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$36
29GB free, PID 1697
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 171
Write 29.3
Mixed 11.6
59% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 0.94
4K Mixed 0.82
98% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G KHX1866C9D3/4GX KHX1866C10D3/4G KHX1866C9D3/4GX 16GB
933, 667, 933, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.3% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 11.3
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 10
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A75 Pro4 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75 Pro4 - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $405
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback