Gigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte H270-HD3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170706
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 08 '18 at 15:39
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	MNE-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$110 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Memory 89.6 1-Core 94.9 2-Core 194 73% 126 Pts	4-Core 379 8-Core 388 51% 383 Pts	64-Core 343 21% 343 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2229 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	Lighting 40.3 Reflection 32.2 Parallax 43.1 33% 38.5 fps	MRender 45.9 Gravity 37.3 Splatting 36.3 32% 39.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP S700 120GB-$30 4,522 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 112GB free Firmware: Q0616B1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 8 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 8 (B0) Unknown 100 100 100 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 50 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 242 (F2) Unknown 100 100 143 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	70.7% Very good	Read 504 Write 314 Mixed 337 85% 385 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 70.9 4K Mixed 3.36 91% 35.5 MB/s	DQ Read 91.1 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 3.44 45% 103 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 95%
Fastdisk 120G 120GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20150818 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2107 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 401 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 270 (A2) Unknown 100 100 1 (A3) Unknown 100 100 15 (A4) Unknown 100 100 20428538 (A5) Unknown 100 100 9941 (A6) Unknown 100 100 9889 (A7) Unknown 100 100 9883 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 152 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 169 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 169633 (F2) Unknown 100 100 121979 (F5) Unknown 100 100 25361677	63.6% Good	Read 469 Write 223 Mixed 273 71% 322 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 83.3 4K Mixed 3.76 84% 36.7 MB/s	DQ Read 151 DQ Write 223 DQ Mixed 22 63% 132 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 64%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 386GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 199 198 864 (03) Spinup time 190 187 3483 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 334 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 986 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 42 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 33 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 300 (C2) HDA temperature 110 102 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	49.4% Average	Read 81.7 Write 90.4 Mixed 80.7 63% 84.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 0.96 4K Mixed 0.21 63% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBD1 2x8GB 3,829 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	76.7% Very good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 29.9 MC Mixed 25.4 79% 27.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 26.5 SC Mixed 21.7 61% 21.4 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H270-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 1,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 47%

Yacht

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	267x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	170x
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	138x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	138x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	98x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	92x

SSD
MX300 275GBCrucial $100Bench 79%, 67,541 samples	38x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	37x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	20x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $40Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	29x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	28x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $424

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16