Asus P7P55D-E LX

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	22.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D-E LX (all builds)
Memory	6.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20120927
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 08 '18 at 04:47
Run Duration	88 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3470 8,730 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Memory 97.2 1-Core 102 2-Core 204 79% 135 Pts	4-Core 390 8-Core 517 58% 454 Pts	64-Core 519 32% 519 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 04B8) CLim: 1224 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.4.4 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Lighting 26.5 Reflection 32 Parallax 35.8 22% 31.4 fps	MRender 30.8 Gravity 25 Splatting 35 25% 30.3 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 22%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 227GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 413 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 487 (B1) Unknown 95 95 23 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 35 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 25 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12200341731	50.8% Above average	Read 277 Write 130 Mixed 159 42% 189 MB/s	4K Read 38.3 4K Write 46.1 4K Mixed 16 103% 33.5 MB/s	DQ Read 40 DQ Write 50.7 DQ Mixed 16 20% 35.6 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 14.1 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 15.5 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 49.3 81% 49.3 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D-E LX Builds (Compare 490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E LX

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	125x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	116x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	89x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	28x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	26x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	22x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
256GB 256GBNetacBench 67%, 2,108 samples	14x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	186x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	137x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	69x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16