| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| System | Acer ASE571/AST671 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Acer MRS600M |
| Memory | 0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20070521 |
| Uptime | 0.9 Days |
| Run Date | May 04 '18 at 18:23 |
| Run Duration | 224 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 23% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Duo E6750
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz
|
33.7%
Below average
|
31% 43.2 Pts
|
6% 46.6 Pts
|
3% 54.7 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 8500 GT
Device(0000 0000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.92
|
0.98%
Terrible
|
1% 0.95 fps
|
2% 1.93 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2306RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
37.1%
Below average
|
41% 184 MB/s
|
48% 16.9 MB/s
|
14% 25.4 MB/s
|
|
|
60.3%
Good
|
72% 95.9 MB/s
|
91% 0.75 MB/s
| |
|
Maxtor 6L200P0 204GB
188GB free
Firmware: BAH41G10 Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s
|
15.7%
Very poor
|
20% 26.8 MB/s
|
4% 0.04 MB/s
| |
|
|
51.9%
Above average
|
53% 71.9 MB/s
|
78% 0.64 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
11.7%
Very poor
|
10% 3.43 GB/s
|
9% 3.3 GB/s
|
32% 126 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds