Asus 1201T

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 10% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus 1201T (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK 1201T
Memory	0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100311
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 04 '18 at 17:46
Run Duration	416 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon Neo MV-40 216 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Memory 37.4 1-Core 5.1 2-Core 11.4 15% 18 Pts	4-Core 12.8 8-Core 13.8 2% 13.3 Pts	64-Core 9.2 1% 9.2 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200 5,730 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1B12) 256MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	0.43% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 0.77 Parallax 0.38 0% 0.55 fps	MRender 0.48 Gravity 0.43 Splatting 0.74 0% 0.55 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.43% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB 853 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: 501A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 109 109 23090164 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -137018046671470 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3823 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 158 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 39 75 77314326567 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 23090164 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 23090164 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 23090164 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 6766 (EA) Unknown 0 0 7195 (F1) Unknown 0 0 7195 (F2) Unknown 0 0 9548	22% Poor	Read 191 Write 114 Mixed 134 32% 146 MB/s	4K Read 5.12 4K Write 12.9 4K Mixed 5.6 22% 7.88 MB/s	DQ Read 10.2 DQ Write 21.9 DQ Mixed 5.54 7% 12.6 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 83%
Kingston DT 101 G2 4GB 1,620 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	4.4% Terrible	Read 15.5 Write 7.52 Mixed 8.23 12% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.78 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.02 8% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.4% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HYMP125S64CP8-S6 1x2GB 193 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 333 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	4.67% Terrible	MC Read 1.4 MC Write 1.8 MC Mixed 0.8 4% 1.33 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 1.2 SC Mixed 0.2 2% 0.57 GB/s	Latency 215 19% 215 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 4.67% Great: 16%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus 1201T

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)