Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K30AD_M31AD_M51AD_M32AD
Memory	3.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140609
Uptime	16.4 Days
Run Date	Mar 09 '16 at 02:24
Run Duration	314 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	46%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	71.1% Very good	Memory 82 1-Core 99.6 2-Core 185 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 473 50% 399 Pts	64-Core 524 32% 524 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760 (192-bit) 10,656 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 8477) 3GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6175 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Lighting 22.5 Reflection 23.2 Parallax 27.1 18% 24.3 fps	MRender 31.7 Gravity 23 Splatting 21.8 20% 25.5 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: MX6OABS0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 71 (03) Spinup time 172 172 17203134775 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 130 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 10337 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 125 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 130 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 130 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 197569544224 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	63.7% Good	Read 116 Write 106 Mixed 126 88% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.17 77% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 107%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 43GB 138 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 33GB free Firmware: 1.0 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Read 128 Write 99.9 Mixed 142 94% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 0.83 4K Mixed 0.2 56% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 94%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB 7,722 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 116GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Read 36.7 Write 13.1 Mixed 15.6 24% 21.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.65 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 0.55 85% 1.91 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 37%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB 428 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 38GB free, PID 0732 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 42 Write 7.74 Mixed 12.1 20% 20.6 MB/s	4K Read 6.08 4K Write 0.35 4K Mixed 1.08 71% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GB 9,947 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.8% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 16.7 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 13.6 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 76.9 52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K30AD_M31AD_M51AD Builds (Compare 2,167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	413x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	396x
Core i7-4790SIntel $60Bench 72%, 13,224 samples	350x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	162x
GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples	155x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	142x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	48x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	44x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	37x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	217x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GBSamsungBench 43%, 3,029 samples	215x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 12,268 samples	111x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $324

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16