Lenovo 20C5A0EYIN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20C5A0EYIN  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20C5A0EYIN
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141212
Uptime16.1 Days
Run DateMay 02 '18 at 13:47
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300M-$264
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 168
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 246
33% 248 Pts
64-Core 252
16% 252 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5028) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4416
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.08% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 7.08
Parallax 7.09
4% 6.16 fps
MRender 7.24
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 8.52
5% 6.11 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.08%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 505
Write 399
Mixed 412
98% 439 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 23.2
129% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 42.9
DQ Write 80.7
DQ Mixed 105
67% 76.1 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55.7% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 16.9
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback