Positivo C14RV01

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo C14RV01  (all builds)
MotherboardPOSITIVO C14RV01
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '18 at 00:41
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD C-60 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Memory 29.7
1-Core 7.4
2-Core 11.2
13% 16.1 Pts
4-Core 12.8
8-Core 13.1
2% 13 Pts
64-Core 14.7
1% 14.7 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 34%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX001A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
43% Average
Read 74.6
Write 75
Mixed 31.2
44% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.2
68% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 43%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown A1_ 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
6.89% Terrible
MC Read 2.4
MC Write 1.9
MC Mixed 2.9
7% 2.4 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 1.3
SC Mixed 0.4
2% 0.67 GB/s
Latency 256
16% 256 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.89%
Great: 11%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C14RV01 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Positivo C14RV01

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback