Asus M5A78L-M/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M/USB3  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '18 at 16:32
Run Duration401 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 73
2-Core 145
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 435
44% 359 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.8% Below average
Lighting 39.8
Reflection 30.9
Parallax 37.7
32% 36.1 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 38
Splatting 36.3
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.4% Average
Read 248
Write 128
Mixed 135
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 11.8
75% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 71
DQ Mixed 44.2
45% 74.4 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion+ Desk 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 29.7
Write 29.2
Mixed 28.1
22% 29 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.28
91% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 97%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
218GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 107
Write 124
Mixed 110
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.68
154% 1.32 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 75%
WD Passport X 107D 2TB
2TB free, PID 107d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 21.7
Write 21.5
Mixed 21.3
28% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.24
64% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 45%
WD 2500BEV External 250GB
197GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 21.9
Write 20.8
Mixed 13.2
23% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.27
57% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12%
Great: 20%
SAMSUNG HN-M500MBB 500GB
116GB free, PID 2028
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 21.2
Write 21.7
Mixed 20.4
27% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.28
68% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13%
Great: 38%
SAMSUNG HN-M500MBB 500GB
74GB free, PID 2028
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 21.3
Write 21.7
Mixed 21.6
28% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.25
54% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
44.8% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 15.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 12.8
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,858 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $128
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback