ECT GBTUACPI

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	ECT GBTUACPI (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3
Memory	6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121019
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 29 '18 at 09:38
Run Duration	234 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Memory 92.1 1-Core 55 2-Core 110 56% 85.6 Pts	4-Core 184 8-Core 201 25% 192 Pts	64-Core 218 14% 218 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640 34,519 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Gigabyte(1458 353E) 2GB CLim: 1045 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	8.13% Terrible	Lighting 9.43 Reflection 8.69 Parallax 10 8% 9.39 fps	MRender 8.62 Gravity 11.9 Splatting 11.9 9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.13% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 45GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9342 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 607 (B1) Unknown 96 96 74 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 51 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 125 (F1) Unknown 99 99 20032632789	36.4% Below average	Read 190 Write 168 Mixed 160 38% 173 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 16.1 4K Mixed 13.8 58% 16.9 MB/s	DQ Read 24.2 DQ Write 26.7 DQ Mixed 16.1 15% 22.3 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 216112840 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 536 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 80 60 109775614 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 7965 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 477 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 21475295255 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 50 555745313 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 29 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 79 79 42831 (C2) HDA temperature 33 50 42949672993 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 128007205296365 (F1) Unknown 100 253 9968956306 (F2) Unknown 100 253 335124536392	92.8% Outstanding	Read 166 Write 158 Mixed 50.2 91% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.09 4K Mixed 0.15 68% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 114%
Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 750GB-$52 41,501 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 511GB free Firmware: JE4OA6A3 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 220 220 60129542145 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1748 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 5422 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1655 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 144 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 85716 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 253403791391 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	50.9% Above average	Read 89 Write 88.5 Mixed 51.6 57% 76.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.15 4K Mixed 0.19 63% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 53%
Kingston DataTraveler R3.0 USB 3.0 16GB-$15 505 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 6GB free, PID 168e Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	34.3% Below average	Read 179 Write 26.2 Mixed 19 64% 74.8 MB/s	4K Read 6.68 4K Write 0.32 4K Mixed 0.08 38% 2.36 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 13.7 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 9.3 22% 7.73 GB/s	Latency 64 62% 64 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

ECT GBTUACPI

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)