Intel DQ57TM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemINTEL_ DQ57TM__
MotherboardIntel DQ57TM  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '18 at 17:15
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Memory 68.7
1-Core 79.6
2-Core 145
57% 97.7 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 201
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Lighting 25
Reflection 19
Parallax 22.5
20% 22.2 fps
MRender 27.2
Gravity 25.2
Splatting 19
19% 23.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
229GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.2% Above average
Read 265
Write 210
Mixed 147
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 33.2
4K Mixed 25.7
87% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 88.7
DQ Mixed 47.4
51% 86.2 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 134%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
1TB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 111
Write 120
Mixed 97.2
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.36
83% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 72%
JMicron 4TB
613GB free, PID 2561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 148
Write 102
Mixed 105
143% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.93
4K Write 2.25
4K Mixed 0.21
87% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 62%
Kingston DataTraveler R3.0 G2 USB 3.0 32GB-$30
5GB free, PID 16a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 140
Write 18.8
Mixed 16.7
50% 58.6 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.42
81% 5.88 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-001.A00LF 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.6% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 13
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 8.2
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DQ57TM Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel DQ57TM - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $591
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback