Toshiba Satellite C55-C

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite C55-C (all builds)
Motherboard	FF50 06F5
Memory	1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151214
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 27 '18 at 13:44
Run Duration	227 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N3700 11,299 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Memory 18.3 1-Core 12 2-Core 31.9 12% 20.7 Pts	4-Core 25.8 8-Core 73.1 6% 49.4 Pts	64-Core 48.8 3% 48.8 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 F840) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4474 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.32% Terrible	Lighting 1.43 Reflection 1.81 Parallax 2.34 1% 1.86 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 1.73 Splatting 2.13 2% 1.95 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.32% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-00000 128GB 476 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT2100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7440 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3854 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 92 92 155 (AE) Unknown 99 99 68 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 389 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 56 47 44 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 92 92 15476980 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9439 (F2) Unknown 99 99 17380 (F9) Unknown 99 99 19872	43.3% Average	Read 478 Write 83.4 Mixed 138 50% 233 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 30.2 4K Mixed 10.1 60% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 21.2 DQ Write 47.4 DQ Mixed 10.8 15% 26.5 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 89%
Seagate Expansion+ 1TB 4,125 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 795GB free Firmware: 9300 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Read 113 Write 118 Mixed 80.7 77% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.64 4K Mixed 0.51 156% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 71%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 412GB free Firmware: AM0P3M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1988 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 11696 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 6907 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3794 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 689 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 13 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 88703 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 206159020065 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 97 97 1402 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 258 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0
Poor: 21% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston TSB16D3LS1MNG/4G 1x4GB 714 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 4.3 14% 4.77 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 1.5 5% 1.9 GB/s	Latency 333 12% 333 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C55-C Builds (Compare 472 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55-C

CPU
Core i5-5200UIntelBench 42%, 107,407 samples	186x
Core i3-4005UIntelBench 39%, 37,483 samples	82x
Core i3-5005UIntelBench 38%, 50,603 samples	48x

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	262x
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	84x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	39x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $98Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	14x

RAM
TSB16D3LS1MNG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 714 samples	72x
TSB16D3LS1MNG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 50%, 976 samples	46x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	44x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16