Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics63.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory104.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170906
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateApr 27 '18 at 10:21
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$462
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 72.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 255
82% 152 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 968
87% 735 Pts
64-Core 1,748
108% 1,748 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.7% Good
Lighting 81.1
Reflection 79.2
Parallax 68.8
66% 76.3 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 73.8
Splatting 75.7
59% 71.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 128GB-$70
63GB free
Firmware: O1225G Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 54% Great: 90%
Transcend SSD370S 128GB-$70
63GB free
Firmware: O1225G Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 54% Great: 90%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 1,395
Write 127
Mixed 94.9
114% 539 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 9.31
113% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 36
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 39.4
46% 76 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 144%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 136
Write 123
Mixed 142
101% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.26
94% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 145
Write 126
Mixed 138
103% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.22
92% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 101%
ST500LT012-1DG14 500GB
466GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 110
Write 97.9
Mixed 81
120% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 0.74
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
90.1% Outstanding
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 47.8
MC Mixed 30.4
103% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 9.5
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 110%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,131
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback