PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock X99 Extreme3 (all builds) |
Memory | 6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz |
Display | 7680 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20160810 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 23 '18 at 02:40 |
Run Duration | 357 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
97.4%
Outstanding
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
70.6%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 117x |
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 24x |
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 21x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 24x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 13x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 13x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $439 |