bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardG77IX-01 _
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '18 at 14:04
Run Duration96 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QE
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 88.3
2-Core 174
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 426
47% 370 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
XFX(1682 241D) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
2.14% Terrible
Lighting 2.47
Reflection 4.38
Parallax 0.84
2% 2.57 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 1.77
Splatting 3.09
2% 2.92 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.14%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BB080G4 80GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: D2010370 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 311
Write 107
Mixed 162
42% 193 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 11.9
69% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 23.6
DQ Write 60.1
DQ Mixed 10.8
17% 31.5 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT25664BF160B.C8FE 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
53.7% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback