HP Elte Desk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Elte Desk 800 G1 TWR (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory	1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140715
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 04 '16 at 11:55
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Memory 75 1-Core 106 2-Core 209 73% 130 Pts	4-Core 312 8-Core 478 49% 395 Pts	64-Core 543 34% 543 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 18E4) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 9.18.10.3204 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 44GB free Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8799 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 283 (B1) Unknown 99 99 11 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 57 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 37 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6431240026
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 224GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP73 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 109 99 22030448 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 317 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 8 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 117711826 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7719 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 317 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1859666349 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 63 22047293471 (C2) HDA temperature 31 40 -140737488355297 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 55 37 22030448 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 8 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	55.4% Above average	Read 97.7 Write 95.6 Mixed 92.7 72% 95.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.25 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.26 57% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 88%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28 4,213 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 19GB free, PID 5580 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Read 187 Write 95.3 Mixed 97.2 144% 127 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 10.8 4K Mixed 4.93 584% 9.58 MB/s	DQ Read 14 DQ Write 11.1 DQ Mixed 5.27 609% 10.1 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 8GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	45.2% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 15.1 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 9.2 27% 9.57 GB/s	Latency 90.5 44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP Elte Desk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)