Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive275% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory60.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '18 at 21:40
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6950X-$499
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 95.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 258
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 1,004
89% 757 Pts
64-Core 1,653
102% 1,653 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000
Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.3
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 64% Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
678GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 2,401
Write 1,751
Mixed 1,816
442% 1,989 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 46.4
211% 81.4 MB/s
DQ Read 45.6
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 192
150% 195 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 275%
Great: 363%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
176GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 408
Mixed 421
99% 445 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 43.9
166% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 38.9
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 21.6
50% 98.5 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 102%
Great: 134%
Seagate ST8000DM002-1YW112 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: DN02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 205
Write 199
Mixed 157
140% 187 MB/s
4K Read 4.05
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 0.37
248% 2.16 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 116%
Great: 94%
Hitachi HDN728080ALE604 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: A4GNW91X Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 172
Mixed 149
120% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 3.35
4K Mixed 0.42
133% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 110%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 238
Mixed 164
148% 199 MB/s
4K Read 3.56
4K Write 2.69
4K Mixed 0.25
226% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 124%
Great: 118%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 150
Write 120
Mixed 116
96% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 2.62
4K Mixed 0.21
90% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 97%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296
831GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 207
Mixed 136
127% 170 MB/s
4K Read 3.68
4K Write 0.48
4K Mixed 0.32
197% 1.49 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 108%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda Pro 6TB (2016)-$149
757GB free
Firmware: DN03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C14 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
150% Outstanding
MC Read 63.1
MC Write 61.8
MC Mixed 55.1
171% 60 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 23.1
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 55.8
72% 55.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 150%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $770
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback