| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 84.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Gigabyte B250-HD3 |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-B250-HD3-CF (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20171108 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 18 '18 at 14:28 |
| Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
72.8%
Very good
|
79% 134 Pts
|
40% 298 Pts
|
19% 311 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 84A8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
|
29.2%
Poor
|
28% 36.6 fps
|
32% 39.4 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
81.9%
Excellent
|
83% 28.9 GB/s
|
71% 24.9 GB/s
|
65% 62 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-B250-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 482 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B250-HD3-CF
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 96x |
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 83x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 79x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 78x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 43x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 39x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $315 |