Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31230 2,472 User benchmarks, average bench 69% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 92.6 2-Core 183 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 347 46% 343 Pts	64-Core 350 22% 350 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600 15,964 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 0835) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 311.66 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.24% Terrible	Lighting 3.97 Reflection 4.73 Parallax 3.56 3% 4.09 fps	MRender 5.43 Gravity 4.17 Splatting 2.87 3% 4.15 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.24% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB 13,178 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 800GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP4O Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 102 Write 110 Mixed 106 80% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.41 100% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F7251U64F9333G 2x4GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 17.2 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 17.1 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	107x
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples	82x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	68x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	17x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,942 samples	12x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	12x

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $222

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16