| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 38.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asrock H87 Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150803 |
| Uptime | 5.9 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 17 '18 at 14:45 |
| Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 47% |
PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.9%
Good
|
64% 117 Pts
|
46% 357 Pts
|
24% 394 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
38.9%
Below average
|
28% 54.9 fps
|
60% 72.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
74%
Very good
|
98% 439 MB/s
|
84% 27.1 MB/s
|
47% 78 MB/s
|
|
|
71.5%
Very good
|
97% 435 MB/s
|
86% 27.3 MB/s
|
15% 25.9 MB/s
|
|
|
42.9%
Average
|
49% 66.4 MB/s
|
56% 0.62 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
50.2%
Above average
|
57% 19.9 GB/s
|
17% 5.9 GB/s
|
34% 116 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H87 Pro4 Builds (Compare 532 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H87 Pro4 - $113
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 90x |
| Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples | 49x |
| Xeon E3-1230 v3Intel $217Bench 73%, 8,137 samples | 49x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 38x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 37x |
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 34x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $413 |