Asus E403NA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAsus E403NA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK E403NA
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '18 at 14:35
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium N4200
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
37.1% Below average
Memory 47.4
1-Core 48.9
2-Core 97.1
38% 64.5 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 172
21% 162 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Asus(1043 15B0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 22.20.16.4708
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
3.01% Terrible
Lighting 3.37
Reflection 4.12
Parallax 3.22
3% 3.57 fps
MRender 3.71
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 5.87
4% 4.09 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.01%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk DF4128 125GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.6% Poor
Read 255
Write 100
Mixed 139
36% 165 MB/s
4K Read 6.78
4K Write 8.38
4K Mixed 3.44
19% 6.2 MB/s
DQ Read 30.9
DQ Write 0.7
DQ Mixed 0.9
4% 10.8 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.6% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 11.3
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 171
23% 171 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E403NA Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Asus E403NA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback