HP 23-d203d

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP 23-d203d  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2ADC
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130816
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateApr 17 '18 at 14:13
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770S-$95
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 89.9
2-Core 161
69% 114 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 446
45% 365 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7650A Graphics
MSI(1462 2681) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.1001
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
5.05% Terrible
Lighting 6.63
Reflection 6.42
Parallax 5.38
5% 6.14 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 5.57
4% 5.3 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.05%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
440GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 100
Write 102
Mixed 104
77% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.04
4K Write 0.08
4K Mixed 0.06
10% 0.06 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
30% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 8.4
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 30%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback