Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 (all builds)
Memory	35.8 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161108
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '18 at 12:45
Run Duration	354 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Memory 84.8 1-Core 117 2-Core 234 81% 146 Pts	4-Core 410 8-Core 644 65% 528 Pts	64-Core 645 40% 645 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 8586) 2GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 28.3 Reflection 25 Parallax 21.7 23% 25 fps	Gravity 28.3 Splatting 28.6 25% 28.4 fps
Poor: 22% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8813 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 508 (B1) Unknown 94 94 119 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 53 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 39 (F1) Unknown 99 99 38952921681	37.1% Below average	Read 425 Write 42.6 Mixed 76.3 38% 181 MB/s	4K Read 41.1 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 1.83 65% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 124%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$50 94,145 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1TB free Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 180949272 (03) Spinup time 96 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 899 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 66325385 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 12139 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 834 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 72 55 521666588 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 50 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 7238 (C2) HDA temperature 28 45 64424509468 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 131851201033672 (F1) Unknown 100 253 14636780915 (F2) Unknown 100 253 142550401165	93.9% Outstanding	Read 156 Write 170 Mixed 130 114% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 5.21 4K Mixed 0.8 216% 2.25 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 198 169 5091 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3364 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 10189 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3208 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 229 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 188 188 38384 (C2) HDA temperature 121 101 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	52.2% Above average	Read 93.7 Write 88.2 Mixed 77.7 65% 86.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.24 83% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 67%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 102GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 642 (03) Spinup time 161 158 6950 (04) Start/Stop count 75 75 25498 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 21197 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1689 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 20 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 192 192 25493 (C2) HDA temperature 120 79 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 192 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 197 192 536 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 194 193 804	25.2% Poor	Read 44.1 Write 43.2 Mixed 50.9 35% 46.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.31 85% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 51%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71 21,137 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 102GB free Firmware: PB4OC64G Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 108 (03) Spinup time 214 214 90194313218 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 9974 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 30 30 30944 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2282 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 844 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 77 77 231857 (C2) HDA temperature 211 211 214749216794 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	21.7% Poor	Read 35.4 Write 40.2 Mixed 35.1 28% 36.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.25 57% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 45%
ST3000DM 003-1F216N 3TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 450GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 112 Write 116 Mixed 105 143% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.2 63% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 59%
SanDisk U3 Cruzer Micro 2GB 1,256 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID 5406 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	6.06% Terrible	Read 19.5 Write 8 Mixed 11 14% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.85 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.03 24% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.06% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBR Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBR 40GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2133, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 16384, 16384 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	MC Read 28.7 MC Write 30.4 MC Mixed 25.5 81% 28.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 30.9 SC Mixed 24.7 69% 24.2 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,904 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 61%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	918x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	323x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	182x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	267x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	218x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	202x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	56x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	51x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	48x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	93x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	56x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $629

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16