Asus N551JK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus N551JK (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK N551JK
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20141006
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '18 at 12:06
Run Duration	282 Seconds
Run User	LUX-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4710HQ 69,536 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	65.2% Good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 96 2-Core 193 70% 123 Pts	4-Core 327 8-Core 121 35% 224 Pts	64-Core 124 8% 124 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 177D) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3574 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 2% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300 13,412 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 287GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFZ12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 69 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 56 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 199 199 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3 (C2) HDA temperature 64 56 188979609636 (F1) Unknown 100 100 10781	56.1% Above average	Read 505 Write 342 Mixed 348 88% 398 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 25.4 4K Mixed 7.19 48% 16.5 MB/s	DQ Read 21.2 DQ Write 23.4 DQ Mixed 46.3 28% 30.3 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 101%
Verbatim STORE N GO 126GB 270 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 45GB free, PID 0243 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Read 78.9 Write 29.4 Mixed 4.73 36% 37.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.85 4K Write 0.17 4K Mixed 0.14 21% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 70%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,486 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 11GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	28.8% Poor	Read 129 Write 36.6 Mixed 43.6 71% 69.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.54 4K Write 0.26 4K Mixed 0.14 34% 1.98 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GB 30,591 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 16.9 52% 18 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 6.8 16% 5.7 GB/s	Latency 80.4 50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N551JK Builds (Compare 144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus N551JK

CPU
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	136x
Core i5-4200HIntelBench 57%, 11,882 samples	6x
Core i7-4720HQIntelBench 58%, 80,960 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	92x
GTX 850MNvidiaBench 14%, 13,931 samples	52x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	6x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	6x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	22x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	18x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16