Asrock X99M Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	94.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X99M Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151221
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '18 at 06:23
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Memory 92.2 1-Core 122 2-Core 242 86% 152 Pts	4-Core 473 8-Core 789 77% 631 Pts	64-Core 985 61% 985 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286 8,692 User benchmarks, average bench 121% Nvidia(10DE 119A) CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2627 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 391.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42% Average	Lighting 47.6 Reflection 54.7 Parallax 44.5 39% 48.9 fps	MRender 67.7 Gravity 47.3 Splatting 61.8 48% 58.9 fps
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 132%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 519GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 12189 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1049 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 51 39 49 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 16 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3183870087	97.9% Outstanding	Read 518 Write 413 Mixed 425 100% 452 MB/s	4K Read 33 4K Write 76.4 4K Mixed 28.4 127% 45.9 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 255 DQ Mixed 123 144% 251 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 97.9% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB 25,072 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 150GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 12191 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1049 (B1) Unknown 97 97 48 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 51 32 49 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 39 (F1) Unknown 99 99 41573878811	94.9% Outstanding	Read 513 Write 405 Mixed 412 99% 443 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 79.8 4K Mixed 35.9 140% 50 MB/s	DQ Read 35.9 DQ Write 269 DQ Mixed 21.4 55% 109 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 131%
Liteonit LAT-512M3S 512GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 67GB free Firmware: VCRF Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 18495 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1234 (B1) Unknown 100 100 226648 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 84 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 255 (EA) Unknown 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 82 (EC) Unknown 100 100 0 (ED) Unknown 100 100 2960 (EE) Unknown 100 100 112 (EF) Unknown 100 100 62	87.2% Excellent	Read 464 Write 393 Mixed 415 94% 424 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 58.8 4K Mixed 31.1 108% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 248 DQ Write 257 DQ Mixed 17.5 78% 174 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 88%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$50 94,145 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 96 186931856 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6153 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 4620461155 (09) Power-on hours count 67 67 29189 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1411 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 155 (BC) Unknown 100 97 12885426185 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 49 40 4845664272435 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 441 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 23253 (C2) HDA temperature 51 60 85899345971 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -32517197379048 (F1) Unknown 100 253 187029461884 (F2) Unknown 100 253 73593432202	90% Excellent	Read 135 Write 177 Mixed 133 112% 149 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 5.38 4K Mixed 0.67 202% 2.24 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA 2x8GB 776 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	71.7% Very good	MC Read 30.4 MC Write 23 MC Mixed 23.1 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 23.1 SC Mixed 20.9 57% 19.9 GB/s	Latency 63.7 63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 80 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 70%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Extreme4

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	38x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	8x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	5x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	9x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	9x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	5x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $100Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	5x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	4x
SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $290Bench 185%, 5,772 samples	3x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x16GBCorsairBench 69%, 3,147 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x4GBCorsair $97Bench 83%, 3,926 samples	3x
F4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 108%, 24 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $504

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16