Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateApr 17 '18 at 04:38
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 86.6
1-Core 116
2-Core 234
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 465
62% 464 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.3.4
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Lighting 72.4
Reflection 65.6
Parallax 81.3
59% 73.1 fps
MRender 65.8
Gravity 56.2
Splatting 82.2
57% 68.1 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
321GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.4% Above average
Read 268
Write 212
Mixed 183
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 26.3
95% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 30.7
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 17.6
30% 55.7 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.7% Above average
Read 268
Write 212
Mixed 217
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 17.2
84% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 30.6
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 17.1
28% 51.8 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 134%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497
554GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
47% Average
Read 92
Write 71.9
Mixed 66.5
58% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.28
4K Mixed 0.32
82% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47%
Great: 61%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
430GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 119
Write 84
Mixed 85.1
72% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.98
4K Write 2.14
4K Mixed 0.48
134% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 76%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497
361GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 84.8
Write 70.6
Mixed 74.6
58% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.44
103% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 61%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
306GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 119
Write 99.8
Mixed 103
81% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 2.17
4K Mixed 0.42
114% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
52.8% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 16.7
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,002 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $581
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback