Acer AOD257

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAcer AOD257  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JE06_PT
Memory1.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '18 at 03:52
Run Duration306 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N570
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
25.2% Poor
Memory 47.1
1-Core 7
2-Core 13.3
19% 22.5 Pts
4-Core 21.6
8-Core 22.7
3% 22.2 Pts
64-Core 21.6
1% 21.6 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 67.5
Write 72.4
Mixed 75.9
54% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.19
55% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 50%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
5.04% Terrible
Read 25.2
Write 3.53
Mixed 4.84
10% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.55
4K Write 0.003
4K Mixed 0.003
10% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.04%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 484D54333235533642465238432D483920 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 2.8
9% 3.17 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 2.8
7% 2.5 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 10%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback