Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics68.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 5 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '18 at 03:08
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-8600K-$260
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
109% Outstanding
SC Int 139
SC Float 147
SC Mixed 141
114% 142 Pts
QC Int 531
QC Float 586
QC Mixed 554
126% 557 Pts
MC Int 766
MC Float 869
MC Mixed 793
121% 810 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 109%
Great: 118%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$280
CLim: 1330 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.3.4
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
68.4% Good
Lighting 196
Reflection 179
Parallax 268
69% 214 fps
MRender 149
Gravity 192
Splatting 133
68% 158 fps
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 72%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 416
Mixed 424
100% 452 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 50.7
191% 67.1 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 127
144% 247 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 118%
Great: 123%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
842GB free
Firmware: 0502
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 78.4
Write 96.1
Mixed 80.6
64% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.26
84% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
44GB free
Firmware: 0502
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 56.6
Write 60.8
Mixed 59
44% 58.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.25
68% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSEK.8FBD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45.7% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 12.3
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.4
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 58.9
68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 47%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,070 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $979
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $345Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i7-7700K $350AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $148SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback