Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics37.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '18 at 00:26
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 70.9
2-Core 126
61% 96 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 287
32% 252 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
EVGA(3842 3966) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Lighting 49.3
Reflection 45.6
Parallax 40.7
40% 45.2 fps
MRender 39.8
Gravity 41.9
Splatting 37.1
32% 39.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 120GB-$75
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.8% Average
Read 258
Write 139
Mixed 183
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 26.3
4K Mixed 21.1
62% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 42
51% 90.8 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 77%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 156
Write 153
Mixed 132
110% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.2
85% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 105%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
854GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 109
Write 104
Mixed 92.5
77% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 2.45
4K Mixed 0.55
136% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 76%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
782GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 113
Write 119
Mixed 120
89% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 2.23
4K Mixed 0.17
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 23
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 19.2
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 13.5
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 66.1
61% 66.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback