Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics79.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170-HD3P  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2351 x 1323 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160307
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateApr 16 '18 at 21:37
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 230
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 668
66% 539 Pts
64-Core 676
42% 676 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.9% Very good
Lighting 102
Reflection 103
Parallax 93.2
83% 99.6 fps
MRender 90
Gravity 89.2
Splatting 89.5
73% 89.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160
59GB free
Firmware: M0CR011 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 467
Write 324
Mixed 320
82% 370 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 11.4
66% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 5.44
71% 173 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 104%
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226
59GB free
Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 480
Write 231
Mixed 188
66% 300 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 13.1
76% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 36.4
90% 193 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 107%
Crucial M500 240GB-$54
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
61% Good
Read 489
Write 269
Mixed 348
81% 368 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 51.4
4K Mixed 11.4
66% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 17.7
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 53.2
65% 106 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 61%
Great: 91%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
297GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 93
Write 62.2
Mixed 59.8
54% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 0.33
4K Mixed 0.14
49% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 67%
GB0500C8046 500GB
15GB free
Firmware: HPG8 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 71.8
Write 73.5
Mixed 74.5
55% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.43
90% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 60%
GB0500C8046 500GB
9GB free
Firmware: HPG6 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 61
Write 69
Mixed 65.2
49% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.44
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.6% Very good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 23
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 23.4
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170-HD3P-CF Builds (Compare 2,521 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3P - $113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $552
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback