Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 5 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemFoxcon AWRDACPI  (all builds)
Motherboard Grantsdale
Memory0.7 GB free of 1.25 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20050226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '18 at 21:36
Run Duration92 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
SC Int 36.2
SC Float 24.9
SC Mixed 29.9
24% 30.3 Pts
QC Int 47.4
QC Float 34.7
QC Mixed 43
10% 41.7 Pts
MC Int 48.4
MC Float 34.9
MC Mixed 43.7
6% 42.3 Pts
Poor: 4%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 13%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS728080PLAT20 82GB-$65
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PF2OA2AA Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 51.2
Write 48.7
Mixed 29.2
32% 43.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.23
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.14
40% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1GB
null MHz
512, 256, 256, 256 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
9.78% Terrible
MC Read 2.8
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 2.7
8% 2.73 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.78%
Great: 18%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical AWRDACPI Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%

System: Foxcon AWRDACPI

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $360Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $159Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $90
Intel Core i5-8600K $260Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $115SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $780SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $125SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback