To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20071031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '18 at 19:46
Run Duration74 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel 2140-$74
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
SC Int 63.5
SC Float 30.7
SC Mixed 41.3
36% 45.2 Pts
QC Int 127
QC Float 59.9
QC Mixed 80.7
20% 89.2 Pts
MC Int 128
MC Float 56.9
MC Mixed 82.2
14% 89.2 Pts
Poor: 7%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 13%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2008)-$62
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 79.1
Write 87.7
Mixed 28.2
48% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 0.29
86% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled
11.1% Very poor
MC Read 3
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.17 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 28%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 3,783 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $106
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $335Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $63
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $210Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $90
Intel Core i5-8600K $260Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $125SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $70G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $830SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $136SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback