Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 99% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 128% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X399 DESIGNARE EX
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171003
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '18 at 19:14
Run Duration	256 Seconds
Run User	IRL-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Memory 66.3 1-Core 116 2-Core 233 75% 138 Pts	4-Core 466 8-Core 928 82% 697 Pts	64-Core 2,551 158% 2,551 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3607) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	126% Outstanding	Lighting 173 Reflection 195 Parallax 181 141% 183 fps	MRender 124 Gravity 181 Splatting 123 115% 142 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 371GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 436 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 83 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 54 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1336392088
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 337GB free Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	242% Outstanding	Read 2,811 Write 1,456 Mixed 1,457 419% 1,908 MB/s	4K Read 42.6 4K Write 72.8 4K Mixed 22.5 132% 46 MB/s	DQ Read 41.3 DQ Write 67.9 DQ Mixed 20.1 25% 43.1 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 242% Great: 254%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 307GB free Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	242% Outstanding	Read 2,786 Write 1,445 Mixed 1,454 416% 1,895 MB/s	4K Read 42.8 4K Write 68.2 4K Mixed 25.6 134% 45.5 MB/s	DQ Read 41 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 45.8 43% 63.9 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 242% Great: 254%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 3TB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 71 (03) Spinup time 132 132 34388181424 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1902 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 7395 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1712 (C0) Power-off retract count 94 94 7716 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 7716 (C2) HDA temperature 130 130 227634053166 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	100% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 168 Mixed 181 133% 177 MB/s	4K Read 1.02 4K Write 2.18 4K Mixed 0.2 106% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 108%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 160 156 6991 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 240 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1325 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 174 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 10 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2770 (C2) HDA temperature 109 100 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	97.2% Outstanding	Read 198 Write 141 Mixed 133 118% 157 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 2.39 4K Mixed 0.21 94% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 97.2% Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 15GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 162 160 6883 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 244 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1368 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 181 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 13 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3093 (C2) HDA temperature 106 97 44 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	54% Above average	Read 96.6 Write 91.1 Mixed 88.5 69% 92 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 2.29 4K Mixed 0.25 105% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 101%
WD 10EACS External 1TB 304 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 95GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Read 37.3 Write 36.7 Mixed 7.85 32% 27.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 2.28 4K Mixed 0.33 91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45 653,654 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.8% Very good	MC Read 23.3 MC Write 37 MC Mixed 28.1 84% 29.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 23 SC Mixed 22.1 58% 20.4 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF Builds (Compare 213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 123%

UFO

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 137%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

CPU
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	56x
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	53x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	47x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	18x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	18x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	12x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	15x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	13x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	10x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $139Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	8x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 125%, 648 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 8x8GBCorsairBench 124%, 361 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $1,475

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16