| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P5PL2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20090814 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 16 '18 at 11:26 |
| Run Duration | 270 Seconds |
| Run User | UKR-User |
| Background CPU | 23% |
PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
37.3%
Below average
|
34% 48.1 Pts
|
7% 52.7 Pts
|
3% 52.7 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Gigabyte(1458 351A) 1GB
CLim: 970 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
10.5%
Very poor
|
10% 11.8 fps
|
12% 14.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
55.8%
Above average
|
55% 75.6 MB/s
|
56% 0.46 MB/s
| |
|
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB
11GB free, PID 0736
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
4.08%
Terrible
|
11% 10.6 MB/s
|
2% 0.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
|
14.8%
Very poor
|
13% 4.43 GB/s
|
13% 4.53 GB/s
|
36% 111 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5PL2 Builds (Compare 11 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5PL2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Pentium 4 3.00GHzIntelBench 29%, 6,937 samples | 4x |
| Pentium D 3.00GHzIntel $98Bench 30%, 4,281 samples | 2x |
| Pentium D 2.80GHzIntelBench 29%, 3,782 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples | 2x |
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 1x |
| GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |