Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME

Performance Results


Gaming 98% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 98% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171221
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '18 at 18:58
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1900X-$110 7,071 User benchmarks, average bench 76% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.25 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92% Outstanding	Memory 90.2 1-Core 132 2-Core 263 90% 162 Pts	4-Core 504 8-Core 902 85% 703 Pts	64-Core 1,400 87% 1,400 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85AA) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Lighting 141 Reflection 149 Parallax 139 115% 143 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 134 Splatting 110 97% 120 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC480G1CS2754D117-514 480GB 1,168 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 343GB free Firmware: CS211101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1022 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 678 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 143 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 45 100 45 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 497 (C4) Reallocation count 98 98 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 105 (E7) Temperature 100 100 45 (E9) Unknown 0 0 5 (EA) Unknown 0 0 33 (F1) Unknown 0 0 13179 (F2) Unknown 0 0 5598	80.1% Excellent	Read 511 Write 419 Mixed 456 103% 462 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 79.1 4K Mixed 20.1 107% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 26.6 DQ Write 81.1 DQ Mixed 64.4 46% 57.4 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 106%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	247% Outstanding	Read 2,832 Write 1,234 Mixed 1,280 390% 1,782 MB/s	4K Read 55.1 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 25.2 180% 67.5 MB/s	DQ Read 57 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 26.5 55% 106 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 247% Great: 236%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 823GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 216 1150 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3150 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 49 49 37869 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 737 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 567 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3148 (C2) HDA temperature 110 99 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	58.9% Above average	Read 109 Write 96.3 Mixed 93.7 75% 99.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 2.14 4K Mixed 0.42 115% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 76%
Toshiba MK3255GSXF 320GB 154 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 298GB free Firmware: FH415B Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1209 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3112 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 30 30 28132 (0A) Spinup retry count 162 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 728 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 137 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 46 46 541352 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 210454249514 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 26371 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 60 (DE) Loaded hours 92 92 3528 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 330 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	31.7% Below average	Read 54.6 Write 55.9 Mixed 52 41% 54.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.24 64% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 32%
Hitachi HTS543225L9A300 250GB-$30 4,341 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 233GB free Firmware: FBEOC40F Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 93 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 253 100 12884901888 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1943 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2621488 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 13 13 38432 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 380 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 103268195631325 (BC) Unknown 100 99 17180655619 (BE) vendor-specific 59 50 690290729 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 95 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1179666 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 2172726 (C2) HDA temperature 134 100 214749216809 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 48 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 98 0	36.1% Below average	Read 65.5 Write 60.1 Mixed 56.7 46% 60.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.36 80% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45 653,654 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	54.4% Above average	MC Read 18.7 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 17.1 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 16.3 50% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 121%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME - $29

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	247x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	71x
Ryzen TR 2990WXAMD $790Bench 79%, 3,658 samples	35x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	97x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	33x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	21x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	20x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	16x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 105%, 6,151 samples	17x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	17x
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 109%, 1,628 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $834

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16