| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 41.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock 970 Extreme4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20150805 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 12 '18 at 01:54 |
| Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 16% |
PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.8%
Good
|
59% 94.1 Pts
|
37% 298 Pts
|
23% 369 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 390X-$340
CLim: 1080 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.3.1
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41.2%
Average
|
34% 66.3 fps
|
56% 67.2 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.5%
Average
|
48% 16.9 GB/s
|
29% 10.1 GB/s
|
61% 65.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 127x |
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 73x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 59x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 31x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 24x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 21x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $396 |