Asus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics79.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive25.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120217
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 09 '18 at 22:19
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 102
2-Core 197
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 507
52% 419 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (98 fps cap detected)
79.7% Very good
Lighting 97.5
Reflection 99.4
Parallax 77.8
80% 91.6 fps
MRender 96.6
Gravity 98.9
Splatting 98.1
80% 97.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 480GB-$152
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 326
Write 70.4
Mixed 109
36% 168 MB/s
4K Read 9.94
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 0.14
27% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 20.9
DQ Write 24
DQ Mixed 2.64
8% 15.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
504GB free
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 97.4
Write 90.2
Mixed 79.8
67% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.36
87% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
326GB free
Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 148
Mixed 175
129% 171 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.31
94% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 114%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
720GB free, PID 0210
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 4.17
Write 77.7
Mixed 58.2
74% 46.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.22
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.16
65% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2X8G64CB8HC5N-DG 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
31.7% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 9
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 9.4
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO GEN3 Builds (Compare 1,479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3 - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $1,018
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback