Fujitsu ESPRIMO P900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO P900 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3062-A1
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120124
Uptime	4.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 07 '18 at 16:27
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2120-$170 77,810 User benchmarks, average bench 51% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Memory 90.3 1-Core 83 2-Core 145 65% 106 Pts	4-Core 197 8-Core 194 26% 195 Pts	64-Core 194 12% 194 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 3666) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	5.35% Terrible	Lighting 6.63 Reflection 6.81 Parallax 7.66 5% 7.03 fps	MRender 4.67 Gravity 7.1 Splatting 7.04 5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.35% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 400GB (2008) 2,133 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 241GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 15 (03) Spinup time 154 149 5283 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2645 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 13 13 63730 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3737 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 1635 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3737 (C2) HDA temperature 105 94 42 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 585 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	47.7% Average	Read 93.7 Write 72.1 Mixed 27.9 47% 64.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 2.06 4K Mixed 0.34 96% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 45%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: 17.01H17 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 141 141 3908 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2541 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 14387 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2509 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 151 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2389 (C2) HDA temperature 113 94 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	36.9% Below average	Read 66 Write 62.5 Mixed 23.8 37% 50.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.35 77% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB 5,657 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.3% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 15.8 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 14.9 42% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESPRIMO P900 Builds (Compare 213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P900

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	84x
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	66x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	39x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	54x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	22x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	18x

SSD
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $31Bench 101%, 14,082 samples	18x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $125Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	6x

RAM
M378B5273CH0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CH9 8GBSamsungBench 43%, 88 samples	9x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 PSD34G1600L81 PSD34G1600L81 12GBSamsungBench 37%, 7 samples	5x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $281

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16